It's so GOOD to feel healthy. Of course I'm still convalescing and taking my pennicilling faithfully every six hours - she's been too good to me to betray and dump her so soon! - but I haven't had fever in two days, and this after having woken up in a sweat Monday with 38.2.
I have even started eating again, and consequently gaining rapidly back all those nice kilos I had shed. I think right now is a bit too early to go running, despite the temperature being very kind.
I drove myself to the conunselling lesson though, which was good because now I'm back home and tired, and I don't think I'll be able to get around to write up my learning journal AND my essay on how Dexter perfectly illustrate Rogerian self-actualization with added notes on how the first season exemplifies the difference between goal-focused CBT therapy as applied by Harry and freudian analysis as applied by the Ice-Truck Killer and, yes, indeed, Rogerian self-actualization.
But I guess I will. (Since I am not at all familiar with the formal essay format in UK education, maybe I should just to be able to push it to my academic friends and ask them it this is anything like what I should produce. I am a little scared by the requirement of keeping my first essay under 2,000 words. Gosh).
I am really missing Anna tonight because I kept mumbling to myself "this has obvious correlates in Buddhism" (indeed, Carl Roger's three core requisites for a successful therapy are empathy (compassion), unconditional positive regard (loving-kindness) and genuiness (open-heartedness), all perfectly good Buddhist ideas.)
Part of my fellow students were really upset by Roger's idea of self-actualization was a baby. They protested that a baby is not self-aware enough, has not acquired language and cannot do or express anything, so how can it fulfill any potential?
To me, the idea was obviously fun and had a degree of truth in it: a contented, well-cared for baby is indeed closer to a state of being sufficient to itself than it will ever be in life; and I was reminded of the many entreaties of Taoist teachers that the accomplished Taoist is a baby; as well as the search for ignorance in Le Guin's Left Hand of Darkness nusuth philosophy (obviously close to taoism as well).
There are of course many reasons why Rogers' image of the perfectly self-actualized baby is faulty: it presupposes a healthy, loved, cared for, happy baby. It also ignores that a baby is not a static thing but an increasingly accellerating process of quest and probing and seeking and processing, so a self-actualizing little machine more than a pinnacle of self-actualization - but maybe that was what Rogers meant.